|
to Completion |
Unresolved After Hearing SC Online Content Editor Sussex County's Comprehensive Land Use Plan update inched closer to reality on Tuesday, Dec. 3, 2002, with the completion of the final public hearing on the plan. Testimony included a last-ditch effort by coastal mayors to solidify protections for the Inland Bays. Fenwick Island Town Council vice president Harry Haon, representing the Association of Coastal Towns, called the proposed plan "a step in the right direction in some instances," such as the inclusion in the plan of a 7,500-square-foot minimum lot size in the area surrounding the coastal bays. However, Haon called other references to the Environmentally Sensitive Developing Area "vague and unclear." He urged the council to consider several modifications to the proposed plan. They are:
Haon urged the council to be as specific as possible in the land use plan itself. "It should be the guideline for writing the ordinance, not the other way around," Haon said. Citizens Coalition director Mable Granke of Rehoboth Beach agreed, saying "if the words aren't in the plan, we haven't got anything." Granke acknowleged that the issues surrounding the land use plan had caused a "very real tension" among council members and between some segments of the county population. Council member Vance Phillips said the approval process has been complicated by the lack of agreement among the council members on some of the issues. "On some things there's a consensus, but on some things we just don't have a consensus," Phillips said. Attorney Jim Fuqua, who often represents developers before the council and the Planning and Zoning Commission, said he objects to the "creeping semantics" in which many county groups -- including the Association of Coastal Towns -- have refused to use the term "Environmentally Sensitive Developing Area" -- choosing to delete the word "developing" in their presentations. Some have verbalized their feelings that "environmentally sensitive" and "developing are, or should be, mutually exclusive. Several at the hearing -- including council member George Cole of Cedar Neck and audience members -- voiced the opinion that the proposed land use plan does not do enough to preserve agriculture. When council member Vance Phillips chimed in that restricting uses on agricultural land denies the rights of the farm owners, Cole retorted, "Would you please move somewhere that has these kinds of density if you like it so much." The council is scheduled to vote on the proposed land use plan update during its Tuesday, Dec. 10 meeting. The council is required by the state to approve the update by Dec. 31. The county then has 18 months after the approval to put ordinances into place that support it. |
|
|
Sussex County Online Copyright © 1999-2002 Sussex County Online |